A PREDATOR has been branded ‘evil’ by a person he ‘systematically’ sexually abused while they were a child and he was an adult.
Graham Simcock has been handed a custodial term of almost two decades for 145 separate incidents of historic sex offences against multiple children.
The 59-year-old laughed during one horrific incident of abuse before repeating the act straight after, with victims feeling ‘powerless’ to stop him.
He admitted 28 counts of sexual offences against children at a previous hearing, including indecent assault, gross indecency and attempted rape.
Simcock appeared back before Chester Crown Court to be sentenced, with the court hearing that some of the incidents, had they been committed today, would now be classed as rape.
The victims are entitled to lifelong anonymity by court order and must not be identified.
The facts of the case were outlined by Myles Wilson, prosecuting, who explained that the defendant ‘systematically’ sexually abused multiple children in Warrington decades ago.
He was an adult at the time, with all victims bravely attending the sentencing hearing in person, along with their families.
Detailing the offending, Mr Wilson spoke of how one victim woke to find Simcock performing a sexual act on them while they were asleep.
The defendant would reassure them that it was only a dream, ask them about the dream and ask them not to tell anyone else, ‘sugarcoating’ what happened with ‘bribes of sweets and money to keep silent.
The court heard how Simcock’s behaviour ‘grew bolder’, with him pursuing his ‘fetishes’ with the victims and telling them that if they told anyone about what he was doing, they would be in ‘as much trouble as him’.
It was said that some of the acts that he would do to the victims would constitute rape had they occurred today, with the court bound to look at the offences as they would in the time period they occurred.
After one perverted and horrific incident, which left a victim in tears and caused them to run from the room, Simcock laughed, apologised and performed the same act again.
“The defendant gave them gifts in return for sexual activity,” Mr Wilson said, adding that when one victim reported the abuse to another adult, they ‘became angry and demanded evidence’.
Another reported what had happened to an adult, but they were ‘not supported’ the matter was ‘swept under the carpet’.
The defendant would show the victims pornography while touching them inappropriately and asking for the same in return.
After performing a sex act on one of the victims, the predator said it was ‘just a bit of fun’ and told them to ‘relax’.
The court heard multiple victims attempted self-harm as a result of Simcock’s abuse, which also caused other physical and mental problems.
Simcock, who has no previous convictions, was arrested in May 2022 but answered ‘no comment’ to questions put to him during his police interview.
One victim, who suffers from sleepless nights and flashbacks, said it was ‘incredibly difficult’ to prepare an impact statement as they had ‘no point of reference other than the abuse’.
“When I started to understand what was happening, I felt completely powerless to stop it,” they wrote.
“Due to the stigma and shame, I tried to avoid as much as I could. I tried to raise it but I was told I was disgusting and that I better have proof.
“I felt worthless and that no one would do anything to stop it.”
Another, who also suffers from flashbacks, said in their impact statement that they are ‘destroyed mentally and physically’.
“From a young age, I always had pain and trauma. I was always told it was normal and that I had to keep the secret,” they said.
“I never questioned him in fear of being abused more. I felt dirty and disgusted. That man is evil, selfish and controlling.”
The victim added that the ‘sick’ defendant used them to ‘get his own kicks’, and that he now faces ‘justice for his historic, disgusting sexual desires’.
Mr Wilson stated that the defendant caused ‘severe psychological harm through grooming’ and highlighted a ‘significant disparity in age’ between him and the victims.
Mitigating on behalf of his client, Jonathan Duffy, defending, said: “I make it clear the defendant accepts that what he did was seriously wrong.
“He wants his victims to know that he acknowledges the harm he caused them and understands that while he apologises, he knows this will sound hollow.
“He wants them to know he is sorry. He also does not want me to say anything perceived as an excuse for what he has done.”
Mr Duffy highlighted that his client has ‘intellectual and learning difficulties’, but that he understands that the court must past a lengthy custodial sentence.
Before sentencing, judge Simon Berkson said: “There are a number of offences and multiple victims – 145 separate incidents of sexual offending against children.
“This is a case of a lengthy campaign of child sexual offending. You abused them over a period of time in a systematic fashion.”
He termed the abuse ‘persistent, horrific and cruel’, commenting that it had a ‘depraved and perverted theme’.
“You used and abused them for your own depraved sexual gratification. The matter was sadly swept under the carpet,” Judge Berkson continued.
“It is fair to say it has had a marked effect on the victims.
“It can only be hoped that by coming forward now and you entering guilty pleas that they may start to move forwards from the past and their lives will improve.”
Simcock, of Ryfields Retirement Village in Orford, was sentenced to 19 years and four months in prison, with a year on extended licence on his release.
In addition, he must sign the sex offender register for life and abide by indefinite restraining orders prohibiting him from contacting the victims, and he is also barred from working with children.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article